In 2011, Nadim Kobeissi, then a 20 year old college student in Canada started to develop Cryptocat, a web-based secure chat service. I certainly blame Heap and his partners–for making outlandish claims about their product without it ever being subjected to an independent security review, and for all of the media whoring they’ve done over the past year.īut I also firmly place blame on the media, which elevated the status of a person who, at best was just trying to help, and a tool which very well could have been a great thing, to the level of a kid genius and his silver bullet, without so much as a call to circumvention experts. Soon after, Daniel Colascione, the lead developer of Haystack resigned from the project, saying the program was an example of "hype trumping security." Heap ultimately shuttered Haystack.Īfter the proverbial shit hit the fan, the Berkman Center's Jillian York wrote: The results were not pretty - he described it as "the worst piece of software I have ever had the displeasure of ripping apart." Eventually, Jacob Appelbaum obtained a copy of and analyze the software. There was just one problem: The tool hadn't been evaluated by actual security experts. A software developer from San Francisco taking on a despotic regime in Tehran. This was a feel-good tech story that no news editor could ignore. The chair of the award panel praised Heap's "vision and unique approach to tackling a huge problem" as well as "his inventiveness and bravery." The Guardian even selected Heap as its Innovator of the Year. Don’t piss off hackers who will have their way with you. Newsweek quoted the 20-something developer revealing his long term goal: "We will systematically take on each repressive country that censors its people. Heap was not content to merely help millions of oppressed Iranians. Newsweek stated that Heap had "found the perfect disguise for dissidents in their cyberwar against the world’s dictators." The magazine revealed that the tool, which Heap and a friend had in "less than a month and many all-nighters" of coding, was equipped with "a sophisticated mathematical formula that conceals someone’s real online destinations inside a stream of innocuous traffic." The New York Times wrote that Haystack "makes it near impossible for censors to detect what Internet users are doing." The newspaper also quoted one of the members of the Haystack team saying that "It's encrypted at such a level it would take thousands of years to figure out what you’re saying." Haystack was the brainchild of Austin Heap, a San Francisco software developer, who the Guardian described as a "tech wunderkind" with the "know-how to topple governments." In 2009, media outlets around the world discovered, and soon began to shower praise upon Haystack, a software tool designed to allow Iranians to evade their government's Internet filtering. Cryptocat is an interesting, open-source tool created by a guy who means well, and usually listens to feedback. Haystack was at best, snake oil, peddled by a charlatan. Preface: Although this essay compares the media's similar hyping of Haystack and Cryptocat, the tools are, at a technical level, in no way similar.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |